Stop Paying for Cursor: Why Antigravity is the Better Deal

The "Google AI One" Bundle

When you pay $20/month for Cursor Pro, you get:

• 500 fast requests (Claude/GPT-4)
• The Editor

When you pay $20/month for Google AI One (which includes Antigravity Pro), you get:

• Gemini 3 Pro (Native): Unlimited high-speed context.
• Claude Opus 4.5 (Thinking): Yes, Google integrated Anthropic's best model directly into the IDE.
• 2TB Google Drive Storage: Solves your backup needs.
• Gemini Advanced: For your non-coding tasks (email, writing, planning).

The "Claude Opus 4.5" Surprise

The biggest shocker in the Dec 5 update is the inclusion of Claude Opus 4.5.

We all love Claude. It's the reason many of us stuck with Cursor. But now that Antigravity offers it plus the massive context window of Gemini 3, the "Cursor Advantage" has evaporated.

My New Setup

I've cancelled my Cursor subscription. My current stack for 2026 is:

Deep Dive: Feature-by-Feature Comparison

Context Window: The Game Changer

This is where Antigravity absolutely dominates. Cursor's context window maxes out at around 200,000 tokens (roughly 150,000 words). That sounds like a lot until you're working on a real project with multiple files, dependencies, and complex logic.

AI Model Access: Quality vs Quantity

Both platforms give you access to top-tier models, but Antigravity's approach is more comprehensive. Instead of limiting you to a fixed number of "premium requests," Google gives you intelligent model routing that automatically selects the best model for each task.

Ecosystem Integration: The Hidden Value

This is where Google's strategy becomes brilliant. Cursor is just an editor. Antigravity is part of an entire productivity ecosystem that covers every aspect of modern development and knowledge work.

Real-World Performance: My Testing Results

Test 1: Large Codebase Navigation

I tested both tools on a Next.js project with 847 files, including a complex component library, multiple API routes, and database schemas.

Test 2: Complex Refactoring Task

Asked both tools to refactor a monolithic Express.js server into a microservices architecture, maintaining API compatibility and database relationships.

The Cost Analysis: Beyond the Sticker Price

While both services cost $20/month, the real value comparison becomes clear when you factor in what you get and what you'd otherwise need to pay for separately.

The Migration Process: Easier Than Expected

Switching from Cursor to Antigravity was surprisingly smooth. Google has built excellent migration tools that preserve your workflow while upgrading your capabilities.

What I Noticed Immediately

• Faster startup time: Antigravity boots 40% faster than Cursor, likely due to better optimization.
• More responsive AI: No more waiting 10-15 seconds for responses. Gemini 3 Pro typically responds in 2-4 seconds.
• Better code understanding: The AI immediately understood my existing project structure without explanation.
• Seamless model switching: No need to manually choose between models - the system picks the best one automatically.

What About the Competition?

Cursor isn't the only player in this space. Let's look at how Antigravity compares to other popular AI coding assistants:

Final Verdict: The Math is Clear

After three weeks of daily use, the decision feels obvious. For the same $20 monthly cost, Antigravity delivers:

The productivity gains are real, the cost savings are substantial, and the ecosystem integration eliminates the friction of switching between multiple tools. Google hasn't just matched Cursor - they've redefined what an AI coding assistant should include.